A Trio of Worth: Miss Worth

images (5)

Like Miss Balmain and Miss Dior, Miss Worth has a certain ring to it. It evokes images of a single gal about town, all independence and confidence and style.  Launched much later than its cohorts, Miss Worth was created in 1977. The bottle I have in front of me is very a la mode for that era. A chunky bottle and a plastic lid.

Miss Worth has 30 notes, and although I recoiled when I saw the dreaded Peach, I calmed down when I realised there is no Peach in this (it’s listed but I could not detect it).  In fact my very first off the cuff, unedited impression of this was “ budget Amarige”.  If you reformulated Amarige ten times, reducing the budget on each occasion, this is what you get. There is Jasmine and Tuberose, just like Amarige. There is Ylang and Orange Blossom, and a woody base, just like Amarige. However, there is also a shrillness and a lack of longevity, unlike Amarige. It’s not bad, but since I own Amarige, it cannot  quite compare.  It’s like fake pearls next to the real thing.  They both look classy until the paint peels off the  imposter.

Where Amarige stays nuclear for hours, Miss Worth throws in the towel within the hour and goes home, knowing her richer sister will get the guy.

images (4)

4 thoughts on “A Trio of Worth: Miss Worth”

  1. Interesting. I can’t wait to read your review of Je Reviens. I own a bottle and very much enjoy it sometimes, though I wear Miller Harris more often. (Any Miller Harris, don’t mind which.)

  2. I’m sorry to read it’s so awful now. 🙁 Miss Worth was lovely in the 70s, as I recall. The current version of Je Reviens is nothing compared to the old stuff, but it isn’t awful, it’s just thin.

  3. Hi Lilybelle and thank you for taking the time to comment. I would love to smell a 70s version of Miss Worth. I think 70s perfume are very underrated. There are some great classics out there and luckily, very cheap usually. Shame about the modern formulation. So near and yet so far!

Leave a Reply